Get the Compensation You Deserve SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION
Bad Faith insurance in document
SJP Sifers Jensen Palmer, Sept. 3, 2026

Identifying Bad-Faith Insurance Practices in Medical Malpractice Claims

A medical malpractice claim can arise during an already painful and uncertain period. When an injury results from medical care, dealing with insurance companies can add another source of stress. Patients and families deserve to have claims evaluated fairly rather than face unnecessary obstacles or unexplained delays.

Bad-faith insurance practices can make an already difficult claim even harder. Recognizing questionable conduct is important because insurers have obligations when handling claims, and certain tactics can unfairly interfere with a claimant's ability to pursue appropriate compensation. A personal injury attorney can review the circumstances and help determine whether an insurer's conduct raises legal concerns.

At SJP Sifers Jensen Palmer, we help clients evaluate medical malpractice matters and the insurance issues that can accompany them. From our office in Kansas City, Missouri, we serve clients throughout Springfield, Missouri, the Kansas City Metropolitan Area, and Kansas. Schedule a free consultation to discuss the circumstances of a medical malpractice claim and the available options.

Recognizing Signs of Bad-Faith Insurance Conduct

Insurance companies have the right to investigate claims before deciding how to respond. An investigation itself isn't evidence of misconduct. Problems can arise, however, when an insurer uses unreasonable practices to delay, undervalue, or improperly deny a valid claim.

Bad faith can take different forms depending on the facts, applicable insurance policy, and governing law. Working with an experienced personal injury attorney can help you distinguish between an ordinary disagreement over a claim and conduct that warrants closer legal scrutiny. Some potential warning signs include:

  • Unreasonable claim delays: An insurer repeatedly postpones decisions or requests without providing a reasonable explanation for the delay.

  • Inadequate investigations: A carrier reaches conclusions without meaningfully reviewing medical records, professional opinions, or other relevant evidence.

  • Unreasonable settlement offers: An insurer proposes compensation that appears disconnected from documented injuries, financial losses, and other covered damages.

  • Unexplained claim denials: A denial doesn't clearly identify the factual or policy basis supporting the insurer's decision.

  • Misrepresentation of coverage: An insurer provides inaccurate or misleading information about policy provisions, limitations, or available benefits.

Not every frustrating interaction constitutes bad faith. The complete record matters, including correspondence, policy language, claim documentation, and the insurer's stated reasons for its actions.

Examining How Delays Can Affect a Malpractice Claim

Medical malpractice cases often involve records, professional opinions, questions of causation, and significant damages. Insurers can require time to investigate those issues. There is, however, a difference between a legitimate investigation and an unnecessary delay.

Repeated requests for information that has already been provided can raise concerns. So can long periods without meaningful communication or unexplained changes in the insurer's position. Keeping records of letters, emails, phone conversations, requested documents, and response dates can provide context.

A personal injury attorney can examine the claim timeline and compare the insurer's conduct with its reasons for delays. Legal counsel can also communicate with the insurer and preserve relevant documentation.

Timing is important because medical malpractice and insurance claims are subject to legal deadlines. Delays shouldn't cause an injured person to overlook time limits that could affect a claim.

Evaluating Unfair Denials and Settlement Tactics

An insurer's decision to deny a claim doesn't automatically establish bad faith. There can be disputes about liability, causation, damages, coverage, or policy terms. The reason for the decision and how the claim was evaluated deserve careful attention.

A personal injury attorney can review whether the carrier considered the available evidence and provided a basis for its decision. Medical records, correspondence, policy documents, billing information, and medical opinions can all become relevant.

Settlement practices also deserve scrutiny. An insurer could attempt to resolve a claim before the full extent of an injury or its financial consequences becomes clear. Claimants should be cautious about accepting a settlement without knowing their rights.

Once a settlement is finalized, obtaining additional compensation for the same covered losses can become difficult or impossible. Legal review before signing releases or settlement documents can help protect a claimant's interests.

Building Documentation for an Insurance Dispute

Strong documentation can make it easier to evaluate both the underlying medical malpractice claim and the insurer's handling of it. Records create a timeline and can show what information the carrier received, when it received it, and how it responded. Useful documentation can include:

  • Insurance correspondence: Keep letters, emails, claim notices, explanations of benefits, and written decisions from the carrier.

  • Medical documentation: Preserve records related to treatment, diagnoses, procedures, follow-up care, and the injury at issue.

  • Financial records: Maintain bills, receipts, wage information, and documentation of other losses connected to the injury.

  • Communication notes: Record dates, names, and important details from conversations with insurance representatives.

  • Policy documents: Retain copies of relevant insurance policies, endorsements, exclusions, and coverage notices.

These records don't prove bad faith on their own, but they can help an attorney assess how the insurer handled the matter. A personal injury attorney can use the available documentation to identify inconsistencies and determine what additional information should be requested.

Seeking Help From a Personal Injury Attorney After Unfair Insurance Treatment

Facing medical malpractice is difficult enough without also feeling that an insurance carrier isn't treating a claim fairly. Patients shouldn't have to guess what unexplained delays, low settlement offers, or confusing denials mean for their legal rights. Timely legal guidance can bring clarity to the situation and provide a more informed path forward.

At SJP Sifers Jensen Palmer, we help injured clients examine medical malpractice claims, insurance communications, supporting evidence, and potential bad-faith concerns. A personal injury attorney can assess the facts, explain available legal options, communicate with insurers, and advocate for a fair evaluation of the claim.

Medical malpractice and insurance disputes can have lasting financial and personal consequences, making careful review especially important. From our Kansas City, Missouri office, we assist clients in Springfield, Missouri, throughout the Kansas City Metropolitan Area, and across Kansas. Reach out to us today to discuss the claim and learn how we can help protect your legal interests.


RECENT POSTS